»Ë»Ñ Á¤º¸

Google+(±¸±ÛÇ÷¯½º) Á¤º¸ À¯Ãâ ¹× ¼­ºñ½º Á¾·á¿¹Á¤(¿À´Ã¹ã¿¹Á¤?)2

 

20181009155313_uwwdehwt.png

 

 

 

ÇØ´çÇϽô ºÐÀº ¾ó¸¶ ¾øÀ» ¼öµµ ÀÖÁö¸¸

 

±¸±Û Ç÷¯½º°¡ ¿ù¿äÀÏ Á¾·á¿¹Á¤À̶ó°í ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

 

ÀÌ´Â º¸¾ÈÀûÀÎ Á¤º¸ À¯Ãâ ¹ßÇ¥·Î ÀÎÇؼ­ 

 

±×µ¿¾È ÆäÀ̽ººÏ°ú °°Àº ºÎÁ¤ÀûÀÎ ÀýÂ÷¸¦ °ÞÁö ¾ÊÀ¸·Á°í ÀÚüÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÔÀ» ´Ý¾Ò´Ù°í ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

 

À¯ÃâµÈ Á¤º¸´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°½À´Ï´Ù.

 

±¸±Û Ç÷¯½º Á¤¸®ÇÏ½Ç ºÐµéÀº Âü°íÇϼ¼¿ä.

 

-----------

Those outside developers could have seen user names, email addresses, occupation, gender and age. 

They did not have access to phone numbers, messages, Google Plus posts or data from other Google accounts, the company said.

------------

 

À¯ÃâµÊ : »ç¿ëÀÚ À̸§, À̸ÞÀÏ ÁÖ¼Ò, Á÷¾÷, ¼ºº°°ú ³ªÀÌ

 

À¯Ãâ¾ÈµÇ¾úÀ» °ÍÀÌ ÀÏ´Ü È®ÀÎ : ÈÞ´ëÆù¹øÈ£, ¸Þ½ÃÁö, Æ÷½ºÆ®³»¿ë ¹× ±×¿Ü °èÁ¤Á¤º¸

(Ãß°¡ Á¶»ç¸¦ ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´ä´Ï´Ù)

 

Shutdown : ¿ù¿äÀÏ(10/8?) ÇöÁö½Ã°£Àεí(ReviewÈÄ ´ÝÀ» ¿¹Á¤)


---------------------------------------------------------------------

Ãß°¡·Î, ÀϹݻç¿ëÀڵ鸸 ´ÝÀ» °Å¶ó´Â ¾ê±âµµ ÀÖÀ¸´Ï Âü°íÇϼ¼¿ä.

 

Âü°í·Î, ÆäÀ̽ººÏµµ ¾ÏÈ£°¡ Á÷Á¢ À¯ÃâµÇÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÁö¸¸,

²Ï Ÿ°ÝÀ» ¹Þ°í  ÁêÅ©¹ö±× û¹®È¸?¿¡ ¼­°í Ç߰ŵç¿ä. ÁÖ°¡µµ Ç϶ôÇÏ°í¿ä.

0
ÃßõÇϱ⠴ٸ¥ÀÇ°ß 0
|
°øÀ¯¹öÆ°
÷ºÎÆÄÀÏ
  • gp.PNG

´Ù¸¥ÀÇ°ß 0 Ãßõ 0 [* ºñȸ¿ø *]

´Ù¸¥ÀÇ°ß 0 Ãßõ 0 deen11
  • ¾Ë¸² ¿å¼³, »óó ÁÙ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¾ÇÇÃÀº »ï°¡ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
©¹æ »çÁø  
¡â ÀÌÀü±Û¡ä ´ÙÀ½±Û ¸ñ·Ïº¸±â